In Defence of Big Dog

Zakhir Mohamad is probably one of the most reviled men in Malaysia at the moment. Following his blog posting titled “Making Christianity the official religion?”, he has been rounded on from all corners including some fellow BN leaning bloggers. Apparently, the offending part of his piece was the following :

“Amongst the interesting moments that was said during the evening do was when the 35 pastors stood in a circle and said to have taken a vow to make Christian the official religion of the Federation of Malaysia and the Prime Minister also a Christian.”

Zakhir was careful to make it clear that the information came from a third party. He was only relaying what was told to him by someone who presumably was there (judging from the accompanying photo). If he had no reason to disbelieve his source, then one can argue that it was not wrong of him to publish it.

Interestingly though, while Lim Guan Eng  and the pastors did come out with a strongly worded statement on the matter (here), their “denial” didn’t really address Zakhir’s claim at all. Read the following excerpt from their statement carefully:

1. DAP and the Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng have never asked Christian Pastors to pray to seek God’s divine intervention to establish Malaysia as a Christian state or have a Christian Prime Minister.

2. Christian Pastors and Churches have always prayed for blessings for the nation, peace and well-being, unity and harmony amongst all races as well as a leadership that is honest and just.

A carefully worded denial is a ploy that politicians often use when caught in sticky situations. They would issue a denial for something that they were never accused of doing, but close enough  to the actual accusation to give the impression that they were indeed innocent. That way, they would not technically be lying. And if their ruse fails and the truth of their guilt did come out, they could at least say, “Ah, but I never said I didn’t do it”.

It may be true that the DAP did not ask the pastors to pray for a Christian Malaysia, but this isn’t what Zakhir and Utusan said they did, is it? What they said was that the DAP had organized the gathering, during which the pastors pledged or prayed to make Malaysia a Christian country. See the difference? Nobody said anything about “asking”.

Why didn’t the pastors just come out and say categorically that they did not make that particular prayer or pledge? Wouldn’t that have been simpler and more convincing? The wording of the statement gives the impression that they do have something to hide. So, let’s not be so quick to vilify. The DAP’s dubious non-denial suggests that there may be something to Zakhir’s story yet. Stay calm and let the authorities investigate and hopefully we will know the truth soon enough.

In any case, assuming that this pledge or prayer really did take place (I’m not saying that it did, mind), is there any reason for Muslims to be concerned? People pray for things they know can never happen all the time. To most of us, what these pastors were praying for or pledging to do may just be pie in the sky. After all, currently less than 10% of Malaysians are Christian. But is a Christian Malaysia some time in the future really so far-fetched? Perhaps we should learn from the experience of our brothers and sisters in Indonesia. This article from Time Magazine might be an eye opener for some – Christianity’s Surge in Indonesia.


3 Responses to “In Defence of Big Dog”

  1. Anwar’s fatwa and the mysterious missing hadith | Helen Ang Says:

    […] Oik65 is in this instance referring to the ruse used by the Lim Father & Son who crafted a “carefully worded denial”. See Oik HERE. […]

  2. Kit Siang dan Guan Eng punya putar-belit | Helen Ang Says:

    […] Blogger Oik has previously observed – on another and different issue – how Lim Guan Eng’s “denial” didn’t at all address the claim at the heart of the matter. Read Oik HERE. […]

  3. Siapa yang kata 40,000? | Oik65's Blog Says:

    […] Pakatan politicians seem fond of using. I highlighted one such denial made by Lim Guan Eng  in a previous post. In Anwar’s case, he is taking advantage of people mistakenly conflating 2 separate […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: